Vorlage:1947 Rezensionen Christliches Bewußtsein: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Aus Romano-Guardini-Handbuch
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „* [1947-119] [Englisch] Denzil G. M. Patrick: Pascal and Kierkegaard: A Study in the Strategy of Evangelism, 1947 [neu aufgenommen] – [Monographie] - https://books.google.de/books?id=VSHXAAAAMAAJ; zu Romano Guardini: ** S. 393: „This affirmation is confirmed and completed by a review of an already unobtainable book on Pascal by the German Roman Catholic Romano Guardini, entitled Christliches Bewusstsein. The review, by August Schorn, appeared in C…“) |
|||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
* [1947-119] [Englisch] [[Denzil G. M. Patrick]]: Pascal and Kierkegaard: A Study in the Strategy of Evangelism, 1947 [neu aufgenommen] – [Monographie] - https://books.google.de/books?id=VSHXAAAAMAAJ; zu Romano Guardini: | * [1947-119] [[Peter Andreas]]: Pascal. Betrachtungen, Freiburg im Breisgau 1947, zu Romano Guardini S. 14, 45f. und 62 [Gerner 171] - [Monographie] - [noch nicht online] | ||
* [1947-120] [Englisch] [[Denzil G. M. Patrick]]: Pascal and Kierkegaard: A Study in the Strategy of Evangelism, 1947 [neu aufgenommen] – [Monographie] - https://books.google.de/books?id=VSHXAAAAMAAJ; zu Romano Guardini: | |||
** S. 393: „This affirmation is confirmed and completed by a review of an already unobtainable book on Pascal by the German Roman Catholic Romano Guardini, entitled Christliches Bewusstsein. The review, by August Schorn, appeared in Catholica, the German Roman Catholic Quarterly for controversial theology, in July 1935, and says among other things: - „To-day the question of the nature of man is put by the vitalism of Nietzsche, which has flared up so powerfully in our day. The `nature´ against which we have to maintain the Christian view of man is not the controllable 'nature' of the seventeenth century, but that streaming and growing 'life' to which Pascal's sharp consciousness was so strangely foreign. But the readiness with which Pascal in his situation decided for and devoted himself to the Christian position has absolute validity, and the starting-point in the New Testament which led Pascal to his anthropology will always be determinative for Christian consciousness" (christliches Bewusstsein, the title of the book under review)." | ** S. 393: „This affirmation is confirmed and completed by a review of an already unobtainable book on Pascal by the German Roman Catholic Romano Guardini, entitled Christliches Bewusstsein. The review, by August Schorn, appeared in Catholica, the German Roman Catholic Quarterly for controversial theology, in July 1935, and says among other things: - „To-day the question of the nature of man is put by the vitalism of Nietzsche, which has flared up so powerfully in our day. The `nature´ against which we have to maintain the Christian view of man is not the controllable 'nature' of the seventeenth century, but that streaming and growing 'life' to which Pascal's sharp consciousness was so strangely foreign. But the readiness with which Pascal in his situation decided for and devoted himself to the Christian position has absolute validity, and the starting-point in the New Testament which led Pascal to his anthropology will always be determinative for Christian consciousness" (christliches Bewusstsein, the title of the book under review)." | ||
Aktuelle Version vom 16. Mai 2024, 10:38 Uhr
- [1947-119] Peter Andreas: Pascal. Betrachtungen, Freiburg im Breisgau 1947, zu Romano Guardini S. 14, 45f. und 62 [Gerner 171] - [Monographie] - [noch nicht online]
- [1947-120] [Englisch] Denzil G. M. Patrick: Pascal and Kierkegaard: A Study in the Strategy of Evangelism, 1947 [neu aufgenommen] – [Monographie] - https://books.google.de/books?id=VSHXAAAAMAAJ; zu Romano Guardini:
- S. 393: „This affirmation is confirmed and completed by a review of an already unobtainable book on Pascal by the German Roman Catholic Romano Guardini, entitled Christliches Bewusstsein. The review, by August Schorn, appeared in Catholica, the German Roman Catholic Quarterly for controversial theology, in July 1935, and says among other things: - „To-day the question of the nature of man is put by the vitalism of Nietzsche, which has flared up so powerfully in our day. The `nature´ against which we have to maintain the Christian view of man is not the controllable 'nature' of the seventeenth century, but that streaming and growing 'life' to which Pascal's sharp consciousness was so strangely foreign. But the readiness with which Pascal in his situation decided for and devoted himself to the Christian position has absolute validity, and the starting-point in the New Testament which led Pascal to his anthropology will always be determinative for Christian consciousness" (christliches Bewusstsein, the title of the book under review)."
