Vorlage:1959 Sekundärbibliographie Philosophie: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Aus Romano-Guardini-Handbuch
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „# Rudolph Berlinger: Das Werk der Freiheit. Zur Philosophie von Geschichte, Kunst und Technik, Frankfurt am Main 1959, zu Romano Guardini S. 94, 117 und 137f. [Gerner 87] - [Monographie] - [noch nicht online] # Walther Brüning: Philosophische Anthropologie, in: Fritz Heinemann (Hrsg.): Die Philosophie im 20. Jahrhundert, Stuttgart 1959, S. 568 (Guardini als Exponent „bestimmter neu-augustinischer Strömungen“ neben Peter Wust und Johannes Hes…“) |
|||
| (5 dazwischenliegende Versionen desselben Benutzers werden nicht angezeigt) | |||
| Zeile 3: | Zeile 3: | ||
# [Französisch] [[Francis Ferrier]]: Le personnalisme de Guardini, in: [[L´ Union]], Dezember 1959 [neu aufgenommen] - [Artikel] - [noch nicht online] | # [Französisch] [[Francis Ferrier]]: Le personnalisme de Guardini, in: [[L´ Union]], Dezember 1959 [neu aufgenommen] - [Artikel] - [noch nicht online] | ||
# [[Friedrich Wilhelm Foerster]]: Politische Erziehung, (2)1959 [neu aufgenommen] - [Monographie] - https://books.google.de/books?id=YIDOfyaskpMC; zu Romano Guardini: | # [[Friedrich Wilhelm Foerster]]: Politische Erziehung, (2)1959 [neu aufgenommen] - [Monographie] - https://books.google.de/books?id=YIDOfyaskpMC; zu Romano Guardini: | ||
## S. 50: | ## S. 50: Im Abschnitt “Das Wesen der kollektiven Verantwortlichkeit” übernimmt Foerster aus Guardinis 1952 gehaltenen Vortrag "Verantwortung - Gedanken zur jüdischen Frage" "vor den Studenten der West-Berliner Universität [sic! Es war aber die Universität Tübingen]" "eine Reihe von grundsätzlichen Ausführungen", "die uns für eine wahrhaft pädagogische Behandlung dieses Themas von geradezu klassischer Klarheit und Objektivität zu sein scheinen." | ||
## S. 52: übernimmt von Guardini dessen Argumentationsfigur aus Ibsens | ## S. 52: Foerster übernimmt von Guardini dessen Argumentationsfigur aus Ibsens "Brand": "Menschsein bedeute Gerichtstag halten über das eigene Selbst." | ||
# [Italienisch] [[Enzo Liccaro]]: L´ atteggiamento filosofico di Romano Guardini, Mailand 1959 (tesi di laurea in filosofia presso l´università attolica del `S. Cuore´) [Zucal, 1988, 482] - [Guardini-Monographie]/[Doktorarbeit] - [noch nicht online] | # [Italienisch] [[Enzo Liccaro]]: L´ atteggiamento filosofico di Romano Guardini, Mailand 1959 (tesi di laurea in filosofia presso l´università attolica del `S. Cuore´) [Zucal, 1988, 482] - [Guardini-Monographie]/[Doktorarbeit] - [noch nicht online] | ||
# [[Friedrich Martin März]] ([[Fritz Martin März]]): Anthropologische Grundlagen der christlichen Ethik bei Nemesios von Emesa, Phil. Dissertation, München 1959, zu Romano Guardini S. 114f., 124, 138f., 152f., 174 und 181 [Gerner 74] - [Monographie]/[Doktorarbeit] - [noch nicht online] | # [[Friedrich Martin März]] ([[Fritz Martin März]]): Anthropologische Grundlagen der christlichen Ethik bei Nemesios von Emesa, Phil. Dissertation, München 1959, zu Romano Guardini S. 114f., 124, 138f., 152f., 174 und 181 [Gerner 74] - [Monographie]/[Doktorarbeit] - [noch nicht online] | ||
# [[Herman Nohl]]: Theologie und Philosophie in der Entwicklung Wilhelm Diltheys, in: [[Die Sammlung]], Göttingen, 14, 1959, 1, S. 19-23, zu Romano Guardini S. 19 [Gerner 91] - [Artikel] - https://books.google.de/books?id=rGQ1AQAAIAAJ; | # [[Herman Nohl]]: Theologie und Philosophie in der Entwicklung Wilhelm Diltheys, in: [[Die Sammlung]], Göttingen, 14, 1959, 1, S. 19-23, zu Romano Guardini S. 19 [Gerner 91] - [Artikel] - https://books.google.de/books?id=rGQ1AQAAIAAJ | ||
# [1959-000] [Englisch] [[Fritz Pappenheim]]: Alienation Modern Man, 1959 [neu aufgenommen] – [Monographie] - https://books.google.de/books?id=pNJWCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA37; auch: https://www.marxists.org/subject/alienation/pappenheim.htm; zu Romano Guardini: | |||
## S. 15: „Some of these views, described more fully in the first chapters of this book, go back to ideas which were developed fifty years ago by the sociologist and philosopher Georg Simmel and which were later articulated by spokesmen for existential philosophy, by the Roman Catholic scholar Romano Guardini, and by others. These authors have contributed much to the understanding of significant examples of human estrangement.“ | |||
## S. 37: „The Modern Age in ist essential aspects is drawing to a close," says Romano Guardini at the beginning of his book Die Macht (Power).[1. Guardini, Die Macht, p. 10] This statement formulates a growing awareness which is expressed by numerous contemporary authors. Many of them refer to our changing attitude toward the machine. They emphasize that the belief in the blessings of technological advancement, which epitomizes the modern outlook, has been considerably weakened and has yielded to a clearer insight into the antagonism between the machine and the human soul.“ | |||
## S. 41: „In 1953 some of Germany’s foremost intellectual leaders, including Romano Guardini, Werner Heisenberg, and Martin Heidegger, met in Munich for discussions exploring the relationship between art and technology.“ | |||
## S. 42: „Some critics of technology have emphasized that this depersonalization and matter-of-factness leads to an increasing insensitivity. Romano Guardini gives a striking illustration of the numbness of feeling which he considers a consequence of the machine age. In the past when one person killed another, a full an personal realization of his action could arise in him. But the situation is quite different when the killing is done “scientifically” from the distant height of an airplane. A button is pushed, and a hundred thousand persons are annihilated.[Romano Guardini, Die Macht, p. 55.] | |||
## S. 101: Guardini, the Catholic philosopher, has described this tendency and illustratet it by the following example. The German magazine Die Zeit reported in its edition of September 6, 1951, that a radio script writer secretly dropped a microphone from his apartment to the open bedroom window of an elderly couple living on a lower floor. The very personal conversation which took place was broadcast in a performance presenting so-called “snapshots.” It is true that the Nordwestdeutscher Rundfunk, the broadcasting company which produced this indiscreet program, had some doubts with regard to it. But the hesitations, which were based on legal rather than ethical considerations, were dropped when the ingenious author gave evidence that the persons whose conversations had been overheard and whose intimate experiences had been taped as documentary illustrations had consented in writing to their being made public on the radio. The reporter who wrote about the incident in Die Zeit saw the most discouraging aspect of it in the fact that the public accepted the “joke” without any sign of protest or indignation. [Romano Guardini, Die Macht, pp. 117-118.] | |||
## S. 105-107: „The first criticism is that the importance of technology is overlooked. Those who express this opinion claim that only by focusing on the relationship between man and machine will we be able to understand the forces which cause alienation. This view dominates a vast literature. Romano Guardini has summed it up in the example to which we have already referred. “When one person strikes down another with the help of a weapon, he is able to experience his action in an immediate way. This will be quite different when he pushes a button from an airplane at great height, and hundreds of thousands of people below die. He has been fully cognizant of his action and able to bring it about, but he cannot feel it as immediate experience.” [Romano Guardini, Die Macht, p. 55. See above Chapter II, “Technology and Alienation,” p. 42.] Like Romano Guardini, Gunther Anders has emphasized the indirectness of modern man’s encounter with reality. […] Such statements as those of Guardini and Anders are valid in themselves, but often lead to false conclusions. Guardini’s illustration, for example, can be erroneously used to show that the advancement of technological knowledge, which led to splitting the atom, is the cause of the tragedy of Hiroshima. The fallacy here becomes obvious when we realize that the condition of an event is not identical with its cause. Nuclear physics is the medium through which the destruction of war is carried out, is the condition of modern war. To say however that we have war because we have nuclear physics would mean to accept a technological determinism which implies that man can do nothing to avoid a global catastrophe. […] We have presented this critique of Guardini and Anders because their statements typify a widespread tendency to blame the machine and the rise of technology for too much.“ | |||
==== Rezensionen zu: Der Gegensatz (1925) ==== | ==== Rezensionen zu: Der Gegensatz (1925) ==== | ||
{{Vorlage:1959 Rezensionen Der Gegensatz}} | {{Vorlage:1959 Rezensionen Der Gegensatz}} | ||
<br>[https://www.romano-guardini.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Vorlage:1959_Rezensionen_Der_Gegensatz&action=edit Bearbeiten] | <br>[https://www.romano-guardini.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Vorlage:1959_Rezensionen_Der_Gegensatz&action=edit Bearbeiten] | ||
==== Rezensionen zu: Welt und Person (1939) ==== | ==== Rezensionen zu: Welt und Person (1939) ==== | ||
| Zeile 24: | Zeile 28: | ||
{{Vorlage:1959 Rezensionen Der Tod des Sokrates}} | {{Vorlage:1959 Rezensionen Der Tod des Sokrates}} | ||
<br>[https://www.romano-guardini.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Vorlage:1959_Rezensionen_Der_Tod_des_Sokrates&action=edit Bearbeiten] | <br>[https://www.romano-guardini.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Vorlage:1959_Rezensionen_Der_Tod_des_Sokrates&action=edit Bearbeiten] | ||
==== Rezensionen zu: Freiheit, Gnade, Schicksal (1948) ==== | ==== Rezensionen zu: Freiheit, Gnade, Schicksal (1948) ==== | ||
{{Vorlage:1959 Rezensionen Freiheit, Gnade, Schicksal}} | {{Vorlage:1959 Rezensionen Freiheit, Gnade, Schicksal}} | ||
<br>[https://www.romano-guardini.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Vorlage:1959_Rezensionen_Freiheit,_Gnade,_Schicksal&action=edit Bearbeiten] | <br>[https://www.romano-guardini.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Vorlage:1959_Rezensionen_Freiheit,_Gnade,_Schicksal&action=edit Bearbeiten] | ||
==== Rezensionen zu: Die Macht (1951) ==== | ==== Rezensionen zu: Die Macht (1951) ==== | ||
| Zeile 44: | Zeile 40: | ||
{{Vorlage:1959 Rezensionen Verantwortung. Gedanken zur jüdischen Frage}} | {{Vorlage:1959 Rezensionen Verantwortung. Gedanken zur jüdischen Frage}} | ||
<br>[https://www.romano-guardini.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Vorlage:1959_Rezensionen_Verantwortung._Gedanken_zur_jüdischen_Frage&action=edit Bearbeiten] | <br>[https://www.romano-guardini.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Vorlage:1959_Rezensionen_Verantwortung._Gedanken_zur_jüdischen_Frage&action=edit Bearbeiten] | ||
==== Rezensionen zu: Die Kultur als Werk und Gefährdung (1957) ==== | ==== Rezensionen zu: Die Kultur als Werk und Gefährdung (1957) ==== | ||
{{Vorlage:1959 Rezensionen Die Kultur als Werk und Gefährdung}} | {{Vorlage:1959 Rezensionen Die Kultur als Werk und Gefährdung}} | ||
<br>[https://www.romano-guardini.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Vorlage:1959_Rezensionen_Die_Kultur_als_Werk_und_Gefährdung&action=edit Bearbeiten] | <br>[https://www.romano-guardini.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Vorlage:1959_Rezensionen_Die_Kultur_als_Werk_und_Gefährdung&action=edit Bearbeiten] | ||
==== Zu: Die Maschine und der Mensch ==== | |||
# [[Wolfgang Grözinger]]: Mathematik und Automation. Die Jahrestagung des Bundes der Freunde der Technischen Hochschule, in: [[Süddeutsche Zeitung]], München, 1959, 292, 7. Dezember (Zu Romano Guardinis Vortrag: Die Maschine und der Mensch) [Mercker 2224] - [Artikel] - [noch nicht online] | |||
==== Zu: Zur Theologie der Welt (1959) ==== | |||
# [Italienisch] [[Giovanni Bortolaso]]: Il problema del mondo (XIVe Convegno del Centro di studi filosofici di Gallarate, 2-4 settembre 1959), in: [[La Civiltà cattolica]], 1959, S. 153ff., zu Romano Guardini S. 153 und 160f [neu aufgenommen] - [Artikel] - https://books.google.de/books?id=UljvwcGtMn0C | |||
Aktuelle Version vom 28. Juni 2024, 09:36 Uhr
- Rudolph Berlinger: Das Werk der Freiheit. Zur Philosophie von Geschichte, Kunst und Technik, Frankfurt am Main 1959, zu Romano Guardini S. 94, 117 und 137f. [Gerner 87] - [Monographie] - [noch nicht online]
- Walther Brüning: Philosophische Anthropologie, in: Fritz Heinemann (Hrsg.): Die Philosophie im 20. Jahrhundert, Stuttgart 1959, S. 568 (Guardini als Exponent „bestimmter neu-augustinischer Strömungen“ neben Peter Wust und Johannes Hessen [Gerner 88] - [Artikel] - [noch nicht online]
- [Französisch] Francis Ferrier: Le personnalisme de Guardini, in: L´ Union, Dezember 1959 [neu aufgenommen] - [Artikel] - [noch nicht online]
- Friedrich Wilhelm Foerster: Politische Erziehung, (2)1959 [neu aufgenommen] - [Monographie] - https://books.google.de/books?id=YIDOfyaskpMC; zu Romano Guardini:
- S. 50: Im Abschnitt “Das Wesen der kollektiven Verantwortlichkeit” übernimmt Foerster aus Guardinis 1952 gehaltenen Vortrag "Verantwortung - Gedanken zur jüdischen Frage" "vor den Studenten der West-Berliner Universität [sic! Es war aber die Universität Tübingen]" "eine Reihe von grundsätzlichen Ausführungen", "die uns für eine wahrhaft pädagogische Behandlung dieses Themas von geradezu klassischer Klarheit und Objektivität zu sein scheinen."
- S. 52: Foerster übernimmt von Guardini dessen Argumentationsfigur aus Ibsens "Brand": "Menschsein bedeute Gerichtstag halten über das eigene Selbst."
- [Italienisch] Enzo Liccaro: L´ atteggiamento filosofico di Romano Guardini, Mailand 1959 (tesi di laurea in filosofia presso l´università attolica del `S. Cuore´) [Zucal, 1988, 482] - [Guardini-Monographie]/[Doktorarbeit] - [noch nicht online]
- Friedrich Martin März (Fritz Martin März): Anthropologische Grundlagen der christlichen Ethik bei Nemesios von Emesa, Phil. Dissertation, München 1959, zu Romano Guardini S. 114f., 124, 138f., 152f., 174 und 181 [Gerner 74] - [Monographie]/[Doktorarbeit] - [noch nicht online]
- Herman Nohl: Theologie und Philosophie in der Entwicklung Wilhelm Diltheys, in: Die Sammlung, Göttingen, 14, 1959, 1, S. 19-23, zu Romano Guardini S. 19 [Gerner 91] - [Artikel] - https://books.google.de/books?id=rGQ1AQAAIAAJ
- [1959-000] [Englisch] Fritz Pappenheim: Alienation Modern Man, 1959 [neu aufgenommen] – [Monographie] - https://books.google.de/books?id=pNJWCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA37; auch: https://www.marxists.org/subject/alienation/pappenheim.htm; zu Romano Guardini:
- S. 15: „Some of these views, described more fully in the first chapters of this book, go back to ideas which were developed fifty years ago by the sociologist and philosopher Georg Simmel and which were later articulated by spokesmen for existential philosophy, by the Roman Catholic scholar Romano Guardini, and by others. These authors have contributed much to the understanding of significant examples of human estrangement.“
- S. 37: „The Modern Age in ist essential aspects is drawing to a close," says Romano Guardini at the beginning of his book Die Macht (Power).[1. Guardini, Die Macht, p. 10] This statement formulates a growing awareness which is expressed by numerous contemporary authors. Many of them refer to our changing attitude toward the machine. They emphasize that the belief in the blessings of technological advancement, which epitomizes the modern outlook, has been considerably weakened and has yielded to a clearer insight into the antagonism between the machine and the human soul.“
- S. 41: „In 1953 some of Germany’s foremost intellectual leaders, including Romano Guardini, Werner Heisenberg, and Martin Heidegger, met in Munich for discussions exploring the relationship between art and technology.“
- S. 42: „Some critics of technology have emphasized that this depersonalization and matter-of-factness leads to an increasing insensitivity. Romano Guardini gives a striking illustration of the numbness of feeling which he considers a consequence of the machine age. In the past when one person killed another, a full an personal realization of his action could arise in him. But the situation is quite different when the killing is done “scientifically” from the distant height of an airplane. A button is pushed, and a hundred thousand persons are annihilated.[Romano Guardini, Die Macht, p. 55.]
- S. 101: Guardini, the Catholic philosopher, has described this tendency and illustratet it by the following example. The German magazine Die Zeit reported in its edition of September 6, 1951, that a radio script writer secretly dropped a microphone from his apartment to the open bedroom window of an elderly couple living on a lower floor. The very personal conversation which took place was broadcast in a performance presenting so-called “snapshots.” It is true that the Nordwestdeutscher Rundfunk, the broadcasting company which produced this indiscreet program, had some doubts with regard to it. But the hesitations, which were based on legal rather than ethical considerations, were dropped when the ingenious author gave evidence that the persons whose conversations had been overheard and whose intimate experiences had been taped as documentary illustrations had consented in writing to their being made public on the radio. The reporter who wrote about the incident in Die Zeit saw the most discouraging aspect of it in the fact that the public accepted the “joke” without any sign of protest or indignation. [Romano Guardini, Die Macht, pp. 117-118.]
- S. 105-107: „The first criticism is that the importance of technology is overlooked. Those who express this opinion claim that only by focusing on the relationship between man and machine will we be able to understand the forces which cause alienation. This view dominates a vast literature. Romano Guardini has summed it up in the example to which we have already referred. “When one person strikes down another with the help of a weapon, he is able to experience his action in an immediate way. This will be quite different when he pushes a button from an airplane at great height, and hundreds of thousands of people below die. He has been fully cognizant of his action and able to bring it about, but he cannot feel it as immediate experience.” [Romano Guardini, Die Macht, p. 55. See above Chapter II, “Technology and Alienation,” p. 42.] Like Romano Guardini, Gunther Anders has emphasized the indirectness of modern man’s encounter with reality. […] Such statements as those of Guardini and Anders are valid in themselves, but often lead to false conclusions. Guardini’s illustration, for example, can be erroneously used to show that the advancement of technological knowledge, which led to splitting the atom, is the cause of the tragedy of Hiroshima. The fallacy here becomes obvious when we realize that the condition of an event is not identical with its cause. Nuclear physics is the medium through which the destruction of war is carried out, is the condition of modern war. To say however that we have war because we have nuclear physics would mean to accept a technological determinism which implies that man can do nothing to avoid a global catastrophe. […] We have presented this critique of Guardini and Anders because their statements typify a widespread tendency to blame the machine and the rise of technology for too much.“
Rezensionen zu: Der Gegensatz (1925)
- [Polnisch] Czeslaw Bartnik Filozofia przeciwieństwem Romano Guardiniego, in: Zeszyty Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2, 1959, 2, S. 97-104 (deutscher Titel: Die Gegensatzphilosophie Romano Guardinis) [Gerner 82] - [Artikel] - https://books.google.de/books?id=fzpDAQAAIAAJ;
- Heinrich Döpp-Vorwald: Rezension zu: Guardini, Der Gegensatz, 2. Aufl, in: Philosophisches Jahrbuch der Görresgesellschaft, Fulda, 67, 1959, S. 435 [Mercker 3039] - [Rezension] - [noch nicht online]
- "In diesem „Zwischen" steht das Buch von Romano Guardini „Der Gegensatz" und ist damit von einzigartiger Bedeutung."
Rezensionen zu: Welt und Person (1939)
- [Französisch] Jean École: Rezension zu: Guardini, Welt und Person, franz., in: Les Études philosophiques, Paris, 14, 1959, S. 372 [Mercker 3830] - [Rezension] - https://books.google.de/books?id=TxVRAAAAYAAJ
- [Französisch] René Marlé: Rezension zu: Guardini, Welt und Person, franz., in: Études, Paris, 302. T., 92, 1959, S. 139 [Mercker 3833] - [Rezension] - https://books.google.de/books?id=JbMRAAAAIAAJ
- [Französisch] Léon Renwart: Rezension zu: Guardini, Welt und Person, franz., in: Nouvelle revue théologique, Tournai-Louvain, 81. T., 91, 1959, S. 1098 [Mercker 3835] - [Rezension] - https://books.google.de/books?id=s7QPAQAAIAAJ
- [Französisch] Rezension zu: Guardini, Welt und Person, franz., in: Revue bénédictine, Maredsous, 69, 1959, S. 392 [Mercker 3836] - [Rezension] - https://books.google.de/books?id=mQPkAAAAMAAJ
Rezensionen zu: Der Tod des Sokrates (1943)
- Alois Wurm: Rezension zu: Guardini, Der Tod des Sokrates, in: Seele, Regensburg, 35, 1959, 2, S. 45 [Gerner 339] - [Rezension] - [noch nicht online]
Rezensionen zu: Freiheit, Gnade, Schicksal (1948)
- [Französisch] H. Declève: Rezension zu: Guardini, Freiheit, Gnade, Schicksal, franz., in: Nouvelle revue théologique, Tournai/Louvain, 81, 91, 1959, S. 427-428 [Mercker 3343] - [Rezension] - https://books.google.de/books?id=s7QPAQAAIAAJ
Rezensionen zu: Die Macht (1951)
- Rezension zu: Guardini, Die Macht, in: Erziehung und Beruf, Freiburg im Breisgau, 9, 1959/60, 2 (Mai 1959), S. 79 [Gerner 347] - [Rezension] - [noch nicht online]
Rezensionen zu: Verantwortung. Gedanken zur jüdischen Frage (1952)
- [Niederländisch] A. Vanhassel: Rezension zu: Guardini, Verantwortung, in: Geschiedenis in Het Onderwijs, Antwerpen, 1959, 25. Dezember [Mercker 3714] - [Rezension] - [noch nicht online]
Rezensionen zu: Die Kultur als Werk und Gefährdung (1957)
- Franz-Martin Schmölz: Eröffnungsvorträge der katholischen Akademie in Bayern. Kardinal Wendel, R. Guardini, G. Marcel, in: Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie, 6, 1959, S. 80 [neu aufgenommen] - [Rezension] - https://books.google.de/books?id=V9oJAQAAMAAJ;
- Robert Hürtgen: Rezension zu: Guardini, Die Kultur als Werk und Gefährdung, in: Literarischer Ratgeber, München, Würzburg/Heidelberg, 46, 1959/60, S. 93 [Gerner 344] - [Rezension] - [noch nicht online]
Zu: Die Maschine und der Mensch
- Wolfgang Grözinger: Mathematik und Automation. Die Jahrestagung des Bundes der Freunde der Technischen Hochschule, in: Süddeutsche Zeitung, München, 1959, 292, 7. Dezember (Zu Romano Guardinis Vortrag: Die Maschine und der Mensch) [Mercker 2224] - [Artikel] - [noch nicht online]
Zu: Zur Theologie der Welt (1959)
- [Italienisch] Giovanni Bortolaso: Il problema del mondo (XIVe Convegno del Centro di studi filosofici di Gallarate, 2-4 settembre 1959), in: La Civiltà cattolica, 1959, S. 153ff., zu Romano Guardini S. 153 und 160f [neu aufgenommen] - [Artikel] - https://books.google.de/books?id=UljvwcGtMn0C
